Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Knowing Is Half the Battle


Perhaps one of the greatest hurdles to get over in terms of racism is admitting the presence of racism.  My feeling is that my generation of immediate peers who will become my future colleagues (certainly not everyone within my generation) has been imbued with enough cultural conscience and empathy through the 80’s, 90’s and early millennium to understand that racism has no place anywhere, the university level very much included.  But that’s just the problem.  That’s how I feel, but that’s not necessarily the case.  Forms of racism may indeed exist in my pedagogy without my knowledge.  When Hooks points out all the old guard professors at Oberlin who refuse to acknowledge racism in their classrooms--how they teach, what they teach--it’s easy for me to objectively chastise them for their ignorance; however, I went to a liberal arts school very similar to Oberlin, cast in the same small Midwestern mold, and as I look back, I honestly can’t fathom racism on my campus.  I can’t imagine any students feeling uncomfortable to contribute for any reason in any of my previous classes.  I can’t imagine any student staying quiet if they did feel uncomfortable.  But that doesn’t mean that it didn’t happen and that as people, and especially as educators, we shouldn’t be aware of it.

Hooks suggests building a community (focusing on the positive), rather than concentrating on building a safe space (focusing on the preventative or negative) (Hooks 40).  I agree.  I felt this should be the goal of any classroom, particularly one where peer review is administered, and I feel this is a great way to create understanding and avoid ignorance.  Hooks also mentions some “concrete strategies” that math and science faculty at Oberlin had to be more inclusive (38), but doesn’t list any of them.  I’d love to hear some of them.

I can’t say that I completely agree with Hooks personal assessment of class at the university level.  Though I don’t doubt hers, and surely others’, experiences with classism at schools like Stanford, I found that I had a different experience at my small liberal arts school and I can only speak from my experiences.  My family is low-middle class and it was only because of a sizable scholarship that I could attend school there.  While some students were like me, others were wealthier and attended without scholarships.  Some were wealthy and had scholarships.  Some were lower class than I and had better scholarships.  At my school, I would say it was admirable if you were working class but intelligent enough to receive the necessary scholarship to attend.  I can't say I ever felt any pressure to act out of my class or that any of my values, experiences, or ideas were judged.  I didn't feel that I was pressured to judge others.  Those who were of higher classes and had to in essence pay for their educations (or whose parents had to pay for it) were looked upon less favorably.  Maybe this was just substituting classism for intellectualism and it's no better.  Maybe that was only at my school, and maybe that was only my impression, but that’s all I have to go on in terms of my views of class on college campuses.  I'd like to look at this as not naiveté but optimism for the future.

4 comments:

  1. Regarding your comment about class at the university level, I wonder if we can say that bell hooks was writing about the university at a different time and it has fundamentally changed. Sweeping generalizations aren't really helpful, but I've noticed some changes at my old university that frighten me. My friend works for the financial aid office, and he says that they have cut a lot of financial aid to students in need and have started to recruit upper-middle class students from out of state. Soon, my state university will become populated from more people out of state than in state. The problem with that picture isn't having a bunch of Wisconsinites at my university, it's that the U of M is only going for those people who can easily afford the tuition. I wonder if class won't be an "issue" as certain universities because soon there will only be one class at those universities...troubling.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Devin, I think your "generalizations" are not generalizations at all but keen observations of the university system on austerity. I am afraid that without a fundamental change in priorities we will see institutional classism and racism get worse in this country not better. Fisher v. The University of Texas is just about the most ignorant challenge to affirmative action I have ever heard of but any day now the Supreme Court could use the plaintiff's cases send us back to the 70s in terms of diversity in higher education. bell hooks is having us consider a rather conservative (note small c) and pragmatic approach to dealing with issues of class and race in the university. Her approach works against a type of abstract liberal point-of-view which does not allow us to see classism and racism in schools because no one who we know (or associate with) looks down on people for being from a different class or race. Classism and racism are institutionalized, so it does not matter whether any of us is racist or if we can't tell if people from different classes have different values; they are things and they happen and they will happen if we don't first see it and then use what voice we have to change it. As a teacher (the way most of our universities are set up) bell hooks has a limited effect on policy. What she can do, and what she is trying to get us to do, is talk about those problems with our students. This pedagogy might require us to look deeper than the level of appearances. I would like to second Molly's suggestion that we continue this discussion in class next week.

      Delete
  3. Justin, I think you bring up a good point about seeing classism and racism even if we ourselves aren't racist and classiest, or accustomed to whitnessing those things. Looking back on my post, I think my setionon class could take a lesson from my section on race. It is important that we avoid these "all Wisconsinite" situations and I think the way to do that starts at the university level; continue targeting the best and the brightest regardless of class/ financial statuses. I really don't know anymore whether universities honestly do this, but based on my experiences, it's where to start.

    Then from a classroom stance, I think it comes down to acting out of our comfort zones and perhaps assuming that not everyone in the class is equally comfortable off the bat, and working to remedy this. How to do this? The search continues...

    ReplyDelete